Because our elections are far too important . . .
Our elections are far too important to leave to auctioneers and well-financed special interests.
That is why Congress should pass the Fair Elections Now Act (S. 750 and H.R. 1404), which offers a new system for financing campaigns that relies on public funds matching small private donations. Doing so not only would help improve the openness, honesty and accountability of government, but also would free public officials to respond to the interests of voters rather than deep-pocketed donors.
If we want to protect the environment, design a better health care system and improve our energy policy, we need a political system that encourages lawmakers to listen more to voters than to oil and gas companies, pharmaceutical giants and other industries.
Several states and localities have been operating under comprehensive public financing systems for years. These systems work. They draw rave reviews from lawmakers while producing more diverse fields of candidates. Even better, lawmakers who run under the systems spend significantly less time raising money than those who do not, giving them more time to do the work of the people. Consider that in 1976, successful U.S. Senate candidates spent an average of $2.3 million in 2010 dollars. In 2010, the average Senate winner spent an astonishing $7 million. It is estimated that senators spend a third of their time fundraising. That’s time that isn’t being spent on policymaking.
And consider this: A study of contributions to gubernatorial candidates in Arizona found that privately funded candidates in the 1998 and 2002 election cycles received more than 70 percent of their campaign contributions from people living in areas with per capita incomes of $40,000 or more. In contrast, following adoption of public financing in Arizona, candidates who opted into the state’s public funding system received up to 68 percent of their qualifying and seed contributions from people living in zip codes with per capita incomes below $40,000.
The Fair Elections Now Act envisions a system that is entirely voluntary for candidates and imposes no new restrictions on the campaign fundraising or spending of those who do not participate. But it could transform elections into true contests of ideas and merit, rather than fundraising prowess.
For these reasons, Public Citizen enthusiastically rallies in support of the Fair Elections Now Act and applauds the campaign to clean up elections by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) and all their colleagues who have co-sponsored this important legislation.
Take action today, support the Fair Elections Now Act!
Craig Holman is Public Citizen’s government affairs lobbyist.
Money and Democracy update: Former senator slams system, Feingold PAC rakes in cash, Colbert PAC is on « CitizenVox
April 15, 2011 @ 4:31 pm
[…] a system for financing campaigns that relies on public funds matching small private donations. So said Public Citizen on Tuesday, the day of a hearing on the proposed act. At the hearing, former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) was […]
June 19, 2011 @ 9:12 am
Pipeline to Power is not the preferred privilege of Corporate America despite their favored position of free or pay for play money for candidates but an interference with US Citizenship rights much as the decision to locate offshore is an interference of US citizenship rights by removing potential capital and jobs overseas.
If dictators overseas (or in Mexico) nationalized their industries, would Americans be forced to pay for military to extricate companies who claim to be American, but pay no taxes, offer no jobs, and voluntarily located offshore?
The multinational company (or any American company) has no right to privileges (even under the flawed corporate citizenship logo) to dictate to American citizens how much tax it should pay in America. The plan appears to be get no tax but get all the protection (in courts and otherwise) of being an American company while perhaps very few Americans work for that company. That is the same obstruction of justice argument under which the flawed Gay Rights debate flounders. Equality in status, and equality in performance are keys to equality in rights.
Illegals, offshore interests, gay marriages desiring economic benefits and citizenship equality without equality burdens is disingenuous and deceptive at best. It seeks advantage based upon perception of privileges which has no foundation in principle or in law, or in anticpated performance.
These are pigs in a poke seeking to highjack the American Constitution by hogtying it and then demanding privileges based upon extortion.