12 solutions to our dumb, big-money elections that will restore your faith in America
Welcome to the 2014 Meh-terms, America.
Sure, the attack ads are blanketing the airwaves, and sure, some guys from Kansas are spending millions for your vote, but all the mainstream media wants to talk about is how much no one actually cares about the midterms. America has had enough red meat rhetoric to send a grizzly bear into cardiac arrest, and that appears to be what has happened.
Steeped in nearly $4 billion dollars’ worth of campaign spending – most of it on vapid, sleazy campaign ads – it’s really no wonder that Americans are tuning out the midterms in droves.
To alleviate your despair, here’s an (almost) exhaustive list, in no particular order, of solutions to America’s big dumb, big-money elections.
1. Pass a Constitutional Amendment
The Supreme Court’s delusional ruling in Citizens United helped to demolish the last vestiges of sanity in the system that politicians use to finance their campaigns. For elections to be less dumb we have to make sure that everybody has a say in who gets elected, not just the people with $150 million dollars to blow on elections. The 28th Amendment would simply state that Congress has the authority to bar corporate spending in elections and place reasonable limits on campaign contributions and spending for the sake of leveling the playing field for those of us who aren’t pulling down nine figures this year.
Organizations that do not disclose their donors, known as dark money groups, can spend millions to influence elections without disclosing to voters who is actually funding the ads. That sort of makes accountability hard to come by. The DISCLOSE Act would simply require organizations that spend $10,000 or more on election-related ads to disclose their donors.
3. Fair Elections Now Act / Democracy Is For People Act / Empowering Citizens Act
These bills would provide matching public funds to candidates who are able to collect large numbers of small donations. The first two would effect House and Senate Races, and the last one would be for both congressional and presidential races. Public financing would empower small donors by encouraging candidates to chat it up with regular people instead of spending four hours a day on the phone chasing millionaires (which can really skew your perspective on the important things in life).
Nothing fancy here unless you count retiring filing cabinets and putting data on computers as fancy. The Real Time Transparency act would require campaigns, parties, and committees to disclose contributions online within 48 hours of receiving them. And before you tell me that this should already be a thing, please ruminate on the fact that in the year 2014 the Senate still files its contribution reports on paper.
Don’t skip this one just because you’re not a well-heeled investment guru. The Shareholder Protection Act would require companies that spend money in elections to disclose that spending to their shareholders, which also includes anyone with a retirement account. And even if you don’t have a retirement account, no one likes to miss out on a good boycott.
6. SEC Political Spending Disclosure Rulemaking
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can also require corporations to disclose their political spending, but unlike the Shareholder Protection Act, it won’t have to break a filibuster along the way. More than one million people have told the SEC to get on it. Last week the New York Times told the SEC to get on it. People would stop nagging the SEC if the agency would just get on it.
Remember that whole IRS “scandal” thing? Well the real scandal is that hundreds of political groups have decided to register with the IRS as nonprofits so that they can spend money in elections without disclosing their donors. How do they do this? We’re talking about the tax code, so obviously it’s a loophole. The Bright Lines Project aims to close the loophole and bring a boat-load of accountability back to elections.
The states have been much more on the ball than the federal government went it comes to maintaining some scrap of integrity in elections. California’s existing disclosure laws have already clued voters in about the $3 million that Chevron is dumping into a city council election. And Maryland is working on passing its own version of the Shareholder Protection Act. States like New Mexico, Colorado, Massachusetts, and many others are also working on passing legislation to make elections more fair and transparent.
Earlier this month the Federal Election Commission (FEC) awoke from a four-year coma to actually draft some post-Citizens United rules for campaign spending. To be clear, the agency didn’t come up with anything helpful – the agency entirely side-stepped disclosure in its new rulemaking – but now that it’s back from the dead, it’s good time to ask the FEC to take this up.
10. Fighting Money With Money
An ironic approach embraced by MayDay PAC and Every Voice Action is fighting big money with, well, more money. The argument goes that to fix the game, you have to play it. These PACs have raised millions of dollars from thousands of people in order to elect lawmakers who promise to support anti-corruption legislation.
11. American Anti-Corruption Act
The American Anti-Corruption Act is an as-of-yet unintroduced, everything-but-the-kitchen-sink, anti-corruption bill. Written by former FEC Commissioner Trevor Potter (you know him from the Colbert Report), this law would tackle the unsavory relationships between lobbyists, campaign contributions, and the revolving door.
12. GO VOTE
Do some Google jujitsu and find out if your member of Congress supports any of these reforms. After your members of Congress are elected or re-elected, remind them that you still think elections should be fair and open. The solutions are right here. The next step is creating the political will to make it happen.
Did I miss a good solution? Let me know in the comments.
Kelly Ngo is the Online Advocacy Organizer for Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division.
November 4, 2014 @ 7:41 pm
Great list!
Here are a couple more:
1.) What about the People’s Pledge?
2.) Stamp your money to get big money out of politics: http://www.stampstampede.org
Justice At Stake Report: Special Interest Influence Increasingly an Issue in Judicial Races « CitizenVox
November 5, 2014 @ 2:55 pm
[…] research is gripping and a quick to read. Take a look, and then take action to combat outside political […]
November 7, 2014 @ 8:27 pm
Now that the election is over, I would like to know how successful the candidates were, who benefitted from MayDay support.
November 7, 2014 @ 10:44 pm
Call it a debilitating passion, but I believe a borrower should not be duped about the mathematically-true annual percentage rate on a loan. But the untrue method has been the method dictated since the Truth In Lending Act (TILA) was passed in 1968 at Appendix J(b)(1), the NOMINAL [Simple Interest] Annual Percentage Rate [SIAPR] the rate for a unit-period multiplied by the number of unit-periods in a year. Why didn’t any Democrat use that as a quest … the true COMPOUND method? The UK uses the mathematically-true compound method in Lending and the USA is used in Savings.
November 8, 2014 @ 12:25 am
One more action is to clearly state the tenets and agendas of each political party so all can see what they actually stand for rather than the vague statements with association to “the American people”. It might be a wake up call for all concerned to focus on what The People really need and want, rather than what the politicians have to do to be re-elected. It IS our country for ALL of us, not just for the wealthy businesses. By clearly stating what the parties stand for and are trying to achieve I think many folks would not vote the way they currently do.
Better education of the voters will bring a wiser and more equitable government for all. So show us what ya got.
November 8, 2014 @ 5:50 am
As if the current Congress will pass any of those ideas……
November 8, 2014 @ 9:48 am
These excellent ideas will never be implemented. Why not? Because the very people who would have to enact them are in a position to do so only because their seats were bought for them by the use of these same disgusting tactics. Members of Congress know better than to bite the hand that feeds them. If they vote in the interests of their constituents rather than those of the Koch Brothers, their seats will be taken from them by unlimited millions of dollars of attack ads, such as the one that helped reelect Kansas’ nonresident Senator Pat Roberts. His ads asserted that his opponent supported President Obama (untrue) and the latter’s raising the deficit (untrue) and usnemployment (also a blatant lie). But because these ads, thanks to Citizens United, could blanket the airwaves with the unlimited assets of the Kochs, they worked. 78-year-old Roberts gets yet another term to vote against healthcare for his own constituents–to continue his betrayal of the people who voted against his opponent.
November 9, 2014 @ 7:58 pm
1. The Supreme Court… is a replica of the tree monkeys…and of little use to anyone.
2-6. …nearly $4 billion dollars’ worth of campaign spending
Great! more cash flow for the economy and the more fool them. Let then spend it!
… I don’t even bother to listen or read about elections campaigns, I know what I want and where to find the real information myself; and so can anyone else with half a brain.
7. This is a sick area (It caught an Ebola-type virus a long time ago.)Quarantine it and clean it up.
8. Some states are doing a good job, others should follow the example.
10.Yes that is an intrinsic absurdity: Fight money corruption by copying it.
The DISCLOSE Act / Fair Elections Now Act … All just Band-Aids I fear. The real solution would be to stop ANY and ALL financial contributions except for one fixed and moderate amount to all candidates. Media canvassing should be ONE hour per candidate twice weekly and FREE. That would be Big Media’s contribution to the cause …and no cheating.
All other afore-cited paragraphs would become redundant.
Candidates would have to present a curriculum vitae as for any job interview and elaborate on what they plan to accomplish if elected, instead of wasting time and money in futile mud throwing.
Then perhaps people might start paying attention again to electoral campaigns and even go to vote for the candidates of their choice upon merit.
That is what a real democracy should be. When that day comes, I will return to vote. If it never comes, then at least I will have done no harm.